Legal Opinion

Vann v. American Motorists Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 7, 1993No. 92-1494PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

David Vann and Lois Vann [the Vanns] appeal from a final order denying their motions for mistrial and a directed verdict. We affirm. Elliot, McKiever & Stowe [EM & S] cross-appeals from an order granting two motions in limine. We dismiss the cross-appeal as moot.

The Vanns, the owners of a family-owned clothing importing company, sued EM & S, their insurance company, for losses arising out of a burglary which occurred at their warehouse. The Vanns claimed $139,950 in losses. After the Vanns filed their claim, EM & S informed them that there was a $10,000 limitation on burglary coverage. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dixie-Bell Oil Company, Inc. v. GoldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  2. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Kelley v. MutnichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Sanchez v. BengocheaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Myron v. Doctors General Hospital, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. MURLINE GELIN v. CFH GROUP, LLC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
  3. Miami-Dade County v. BarilariDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API