Legal Opinion

Catmull v. Johnson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1975No. 13927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Plaintiffs initiated this action to recover certain royalty payments which they claimed were due and owing pursuant to an agreement between them and defendant Johnson, and which was binding upon the other defendants as successors in interest to Johnson. Upon trial before the court, plaintiffs were granted judgment and they were awarded payments for the years 1971, 1972, and 1973. Defendants appeal therefrom.

On February 28, 1966, plaintiffs conveyed three mining claims to defendant Johnson and his wife. These were situated in Little Cottonwood Canyon, and known as the Free…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cummings v. NielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Ensign v. BohnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Cummings v. EnglandUtah Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Kellner v. BartmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Cahoon v. CahoonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Brooks v. TertelingIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Power v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API