Legal Opinion

Lansky v. Goldstein

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 24, 1975No. 51129, 51405PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stolz, Judge.

1. "On a motion for summary judgment the burden of establishing the non-existence of any genuine issue of fact is upon the moving party and all doubts are to be resolved against the movant. The movant has that burden even as to issues upon which the opposing party would have the trial burden, and the moving party’s papers are carefully scrutinized, while the opposing party’s papers, if any, are treated with considerable indulgence. Colonial Stores v. Turner, 117 Ga. App. 331 (160 SE2d 672).” Ham v. Ham, 230 Ga. 43, 45 (195 SE2d 429).

Accordingly, where the resident-movant had…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Gilson v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Colonial Stores, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Ham v. HamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  5. City of Moultrie v. Schofield's Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Brooks v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Garrett v. HeislerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Parks v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Taylor v. Career Concepts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Walker v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API