Legal Opinion
United States v. Eugene Sherbak, United States of America v. John Douglas Salih
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 8, 1992No. 91-8128, 91-8130PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Per curiam
In these consolidated Sentencing Guideline appeals, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Eugene Sherbak and John Douglas Salih, who were convicted following guilty pleas to several related drug violations, complain that the district court failed to make explicit factual findings on the record regarding the quantity of marijuana for which Defendants-Appellants could be held responsible for purposes of calculating their respective base offense levels. Salih makes a similar complaint concerning the district court’s failure to reduce his base offense level for acceptance of responsibility. Sherbak and Salih…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Melody ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Richard Young AlfaroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Armando MirCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. CalverleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Puig-InfanteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Octavio Carreon, and Armando MelendezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Amy Ralston Pofahl, Charles T. Nunn, and Randy WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.