Legal Opinion

Rucker v. DeLAY

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 23, 2010No. 101,766PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Larson, J.:

In this quiet title action, Earl R. DeLay and other heirs of Earl R. DeLay and Leah Griffith DeLay, his wife, appeal from the trial court’s entry of judgment after a trial on stipulated facts in favor of Donald R. Rucker and Barbara L. Rucker that a reservation in a 1924 deed was of a royalty interest which violated the rule against perpetuities.

The record and stipulation reflect that on May 17,1924, in consideration of $1,200, Earl R. DeLay and Leah Griffith DeLay, his wife, executed a general warranty deed in favor of Lurena Keener covering the NW/SW/4 of Section 4 and the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Double M Construction, Inc. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Klingman v. GilbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Cosgrove v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. Richards v. ShearerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Lathrop v. EyestoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rucker v. DeLaySupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. Venable Royalty, LTD, and V14, LP v. EQT Production Company, ET Blue Grass, LLC, and AMP IV, LPIntermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API