Lucky v. Holland
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
883 A.2d 419 (2005)
380 N.J. Super. 566
Doris LUCKY & Walter Lucky, her husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Matthew HOLLAND & Jack Holland, Defendants-Respondents.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted September 13, 2005.
Decided October 12, 2005.
Colligan & Colligan, attorneys for appellants (Edward M. Colligan, on the brief).
Connell Foley, attorneys for respondents (Brian G. Steller, Roseland, of counsel; Mr. Steller and Gregory E. Peterson, on the brief).
Before Judges COBURN, COLLESTER and LISA.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
LISA, J.A.D.
Plaintiff, Doris Lucky,[1]…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Polk v. DaconceicaoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Loftus-Smith v. HenryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davidson v. SlaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Davidson v. SlaterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Hardison v. KingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005