Legal Opinion

Lucky v. Holland

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 12, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

883 A.2d 419 (2005)

380 N.J. Super. 566

Doris LUCKY & Walter Lucky, her husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Matthew HOLLAND & Jack Holland, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted September 13, 2005.

Decided October 12, 2005.

Colligan & Colligan, attorneys for appellants (Edward M. Colligan, on the brief).

Connell Foley, attorneys for respondents (Brian G. Steller, Roseland, of counsel; Mr. Steller and Gregory E. Peterson, on the brief).

Before Judges COBURN, COLLESTER and LISA.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LISA, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Doris Lucky,[1]…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Polk v. DaconceicaoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  5. Loftus-Smith v. HenryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davidson v. SlaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. Davidson v. SlaterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  3. Hardison v. KingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API