Hillis v. Blanchard
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
FINCH, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal from an adverse judgment in this suit wherein they sought (1) a declaration of their rights under a written contract, (2) specific performance of a provision therein for the purchase of 93 acres of land, and (3) possession of other *277land leased pursuant to the contract, together with damages for wrongful taking and withholding of possession by the defendant. We have jurisdiction because a suit for specific performance of a contract to sell land involves title to real estate. Wilkinson v. Vaughn, Mo., 419 S.W.2d 1. In addition, plaintiffs sought damages…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilkinson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- McQuary v. Missouri Land Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Ferguson v. KindleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
3Cited by16 opinions
- Warwick v. MatheneyMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Rental Storage & Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- AEE-EMF, INC. v. PassmoreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Artcraft Cabinet, Inc. v. Watajo, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Statler Manufacturing, Inc. v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.