Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Gossett Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1937No. 26143PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

1. If a criminal process is sued out without probable cause, and an arrest is made under it, the remedy of the accused depends on whether or not he is actually prosecuted under the warrant. If after' the arrest the warrant is dismissed or not followed up, the remedy is for malicious arrest. But if the action is carried on to a1 prosecution, an action for malicious prosecution is the exclusive remedy, and an action for malicious arrest will not lie. Grist v. White, 14 Ga. App. 147 (80 S. E. 519). Therefore, where a petition was brought in two counts, one for malicious prosecution and the other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hearn v. BatchelorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Grist v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  3. Neidlinger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McCord v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Smith v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Hartsfield v. Union City Chrysler-PlymouthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Spivey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Perry v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API