Legal Opinion

Hood v. Welch

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 8, 1974No. 73-268PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This was originally an action brought by a landlord, E.W. Hood, to recover damages from his tenant, Carl F. Welch, on the ground that the tenant’s negligence or violation of law caused a fire which extensively damaged the leased building. Most of the,salient facts were stated in our opinion upon the first appeal and need not be repeated. Hood v. Welch, 249 Ark. 1159, 463 S.W. 2d 362 (1971). There we held that the trial court erred in entering a summary judgment for the tenant, because the lease was sufficiently ambiguous to give rise to a question of fact about…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rice v. WaddillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  2. Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. OwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Cox v. GettysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  5. Triska v. SavageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mercantile Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Mercantile Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Welch v. HoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API