Coopersville Motors, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a second motion for summary judgment filed by DefendanVCounter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff Federated Mutual Insurance Company (“Federated”). 1 (Dkt. No. 47.) Federated contends that it is entitled to summary judgment because Robert L. Anderson has no authority to sue on behalf of Coopersville Motors, Inc. (“CMI”), and, additionally, because no coverage is owed under the Federated policy of insurance issued to CMI (the “Policy”) for Plaintiffs claims.
In response, Plaintiff CMI contends that the issues raised in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Flint Cold Storage v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Middleburg Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. v. McNeil & Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014