Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Byrnes

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 2, 1933PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

In this accounting proceeding questions have arisen as to the effect upon the terms of the will of the withdrawal by the . widow of the testator of her elective share under section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law. In a previous special proceeding I held that the terms of the will did not sufficiently comply with the statute so as to prevent the election by the widow. It was decided that she was entitled to take her statutory share. That determination was affirmed by the Appellate Division and by the Court of Appeals (141 Misc. 346; affd., 235 App. Div. 782; affd., 260 N. Y. 465).

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of SilsbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Matter of ByrnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of DevineNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of ByrnesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  5. In re Kings County Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of HellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. In re the Estate of CurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of LevyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  4. In re the Estate of IttlesonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  5. In re the Estate of TopazioNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API