Legal Opinion

Butler v. Young

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1939No. 8826PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riley, Judge:

This is a partition suit brought by Carrie Butler and J. C. Springston against Charles R. Davisson, Maggie Davisson and Hilda D. Young for the purpose of partition ing certain real estate of which defendants’ intestate died seized. From a decree dismissing plaintiffs’ bill of complaint, they appeal.

The part of the record before this Court, consisting of the bill of complaint, the answer of the defendant, Hilda D. Young, and plaintiffs’ replication to said answer, presents the single question: What is the legal effect of a stipulation, in a contract between an attorney and client…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. North Chicago Street Railroad v. AckleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Matter of SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Shirk v. NeibleIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Davis v. WebberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  5. Watkins v. SedberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1923

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Calvert v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Cummings v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
  3. State Ex Rel. McNabb v. Allen Superior Court No. 2Indiana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Capehart v. ChurchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Barnes v. QuigleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API