Legal Opinion

Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Decided March 31, 2003No. CIV.A. 102CV32PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND

KEELEY, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. The motion is fully briefed and ripe for review. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED.

BACKGROUND.

This is a pharmaceutical drug patent infringement action. Plaintiffs Daiichi Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd. (Daiichi), Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Or- tho), and Johnson & Johnson Research & Development, LLC (J & J) are brand-name pharmaceutical manufacturers. Defendants Mylan Laboratories, Inc. and Mylan…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Hutsell v. SayreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. Burns v. AAF-McQuay, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wyeth v. Lupin Ltd.District Court, D. Maryland · 2007
  2. Aktiebolag v. ANDRX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API