Legal Opinion

Aaberg v. Minnesota Commercial Men's Ass'n

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1922No. 22,753PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlam, J.

Albert Aaberg, now deceased, commenced this action to recover benefits under a certificate of health and accident insurance issued to him by defendant. The case was tried and a verdict rendered for plaintiff. Defendant appealed. A new trial was granted on the ground that the court excluded from evidence the by-laws of defendant which constituted part of the contract, the particular sections, the exclusion of which was complained of, stipulated that certain specified representations in the application were warranties, that defendant should be relieved from liability if the assured took out…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gasser v. Sun Fire OfficeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Whitney v. National Masonic Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Hogadone v. Grange Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Smith v. Preferred Masonic Mut. Acc. Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1892
  5. Kearney v. Washtenaw Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Park Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 32Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. Steele v. Great Eastern Casualty & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Aaberg v. Minneapolis Commercial Men's Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Park Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 32Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Park Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 32Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API