Crawford v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtBessey, P. J.
Arch Crawford, plaintiff in error, herein designated the defendant, was by verdict of a jury found guilty of the larceny of an automobile, with his punishment assessed by the jury at confinement in the state reformatory at Granite for a period of five years.
Four assignments of error are urged in this appeal: (1) That the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict; (2) that there was a fatal variance between the allegations and the proof; (3) error in the court’s instructions to the jury; (4) that the judgment does not conform to the verdict.
The evidence for the state discloses that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex Parte HayesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Leyerle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Carson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Dickson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
- Smith-M'Cord Dry Goods Co. v. Jno. B. Farwell Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- Heglin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
- Dean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
- Copeland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931