Legal Opinion

United States v. Evans

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 10, 1997No. 96 CR 436PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

On January 8, 1996, the defendant, Jesse Evans, made certain statements to James Koch, an attorney, during a conversation at Mr. Koch’s office, at which Mr. Evans, Mr. Koch, and John Holden were present. The government has moved to admit at trial Mr. Koch’s testimony regarding the conversation. At issue is whether Mr. Evans’ statements to Mr. Koch are protected by the attorney-client privilege. This determination depends on the role Mr. Holden was playing at the meeting. For the following reasons, the government’s motion is granted.

I

The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. GillockSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Moreno L. Keplinger, Paul L. Wright, and James B. PlankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. United States of America and William C. McCormick Special Agent, Irs v. J. Martin LawlessCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tony Davis BALLARD, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Richard L. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Jesse J. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Diversified Group, Inc. v. DaugerdasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. Sain v. NagelDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  4. Diemer v. Fraternal Order of Police, Chicago Lodge 7District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  5. Margules v. BeckstedtAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API