Legal Opinion

Mobius v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided June 24, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00499Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DANA MOBIUS and HANS MOBIUS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:19-cv-00499 QUEST DIAGNOSTICS CLINICAL ) LABORATORIES, INC., QUEST ) DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED, QUEST ) DIAGNOSTICS OF PENNSYLVANIA INC., ) QUEST DIAGNOSTICS HOLDINGS ) INCORPORATED, and JOHN DOE #1, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR REASONABLE EXPENSES AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES (Doc. 13) Plaintiffs Dana Mobius and Hans Mobius (“Plaintiffs”) bring this action against Defendants Quest Diagnostics Clinical…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Lisa Petrosino v. Bell AtlanticCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Global NAPs Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,803 Steven Flaks v. David I. Koegel and Flora Mir Candy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. Agiwal v. Mid Island Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API