Federal Election Commission v. Christian Action Network, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Fees and other expenses awarded and case remanded by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Judge RUSSELL and Senior Judge CHAPMAN joined.
OPINION
LUTTIG, Circuit Judge:
The Supreme Court of the United States held in Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 96 S.Ct. 612, 46 L.Ed.2d 659 (1976), and reaffirmed in FEC v. Massachusetts Citizens For Life, Inc., 479 U.S. 238, 107 S.Ct. 616, 93 L.Ed.2d 539 (1986), that corporate expenditures for political communications violate 2 U.S.C. § 441b(a) only if the communications employ “explicit words,” “express words,” or “language” advocating the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Federal Election Commission v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- North Carolina Right to Life, Inc. v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Elections Board v. Wisconsin Manufacturers & CommerceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- California Pro-Life Council, Inc. v. GetmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- North Carolina Right To Life, Inc. v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Citizens for Responsible Government State Political Action Committee v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.