Legal Opinion

North Carolina Right to Life, Inc. v. Bartlett

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 17, 1999No. 98-1636PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in part and reversed in pai't by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge ERVIN and Judge WILKINS joined.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Chief Judge:

Appellees North Carolina Right to Life (NCRL), its political action committee, and its president brought suit in federal district court challenging the constitutionality of several provisions of North Carolina election and campaign finance law. The district court found for NCRL on each of its claims. North Carolina Right to Life, Inc. v. Bartlett, 3 F.Supp.2d 675 (E.D.N.C.1998). The State of North Carolina appeals.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Federal Election Commission v. BeaumontSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Thalheimer v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Rhode Island Ass'n of Realtors v. WhitehouseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. North Carolina Right to Life, Inc. v. LeakeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  5. Family Pac v. Rob McKennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API