Helb v. Hake
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 331, Jan. T., 1901, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. York Co., Oct. T., 1892, No. 1, on bill in equity, in case of Frederick Helb'v. Frederick A. Hake. Bill in equity by one partner against another for an account. Before Bittengeb, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was the decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Potter,
This bill was filed for the settlement of accounts between partners.
The case was referred to a master, and among other claims presented by the defendant was one item for labor in woods, five and a half years, $1,100 and another for stationery, traveling expenses, and office work, six years, $600.
The master refused to allow these claims, but upon exceptions filed to his report, and upon hearing, the court below reversed the finding of the master in this respect, and allowed the defendant the amount claimed by him for these items, aggregating $1,700.
This allowance…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Kirshon, Et Ux. v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Penn Cigar Co. v. FriedbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920