Legal Opinion

Bromley v. Standard-Plunger Elevator Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided April 5, 1906No. 18Published

At Law. On motion for new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, District Judge.

This is a motion for a new trial. From the amount of the verdict it is clear the jury did not adopt the plaintiffs’ contention that they should be allowed 10 per cent, commission. Apart from all other contentions it will therefore be seen the testimony as to the worth of the services in question generally, and wdthout reference to specific contracts, did not lead the jury to adopt the alleged 10 per cent, of the contract. If, however, they had adopted such 10 per cent, basis, we are of opinion there was no error in admitting testimony to show the worth of such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buckingham v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Barney v. FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Barney v. . FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Rauch v. Scholl & MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API