Legal Opinion
Casey, Jr. v. 3M Company
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 12, 2019No. 1:18-cv-11211Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS __________________________________________ ) ) JAMES T. CASEY, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 18-cv-11211-DJC ) 3M CORPORATION and ) APAX PARTNERS, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) __________________________________________) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CASPER, J. February 12, 2019 I. Introduction Plaintiff James T. Casey, Jr. (“Casey”), proceeding pro se, has filed the instant lawsuit against Defendants 3M Company (“3M”), which is incorrectly identified as 3M Corporation in the operative complaint, and Apax Partners (collectively, “Defendants”).…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.