Legal Opinion

Lankford v. Commodore Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 24, 1988No. WCB 83-11629; CA A37173PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.

In this workers’ compensation case, claimant was awarded permanent total disability (PTD) benefits by a determination order. Employer requested a hearing, contending that claimant’s failure to seek employment as a respite care provider disqualified her from receiving PTD benefits under ORS 656.206(3). In a labor market survey made on behalf of employer by Columbia Rehabilitation Consultants, Inc. (CRC), respite care is “defined as ‘adult sitting,’ designed to give the primary care giver an interval of rest or relief.” The referee approved the PTD award, holding that the respite care position…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Crumley v. Combustion EngineeringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Pournelle v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Wiley v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tee v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Gornick v. J. Frank Schmidt & SonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Tee v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API