Legal Opinion

State v. Fox

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1972No. 71-623PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRrowk, J.

The defendant raises two propositions of law for consideration by this court:

*611. Intention or purpose to kill may be present in the crime of manslaughter, when the killing is without malice upon a sudden quarrel, and a charge by the court to the jury that the crime of manslaughter in the first degree is distinguished from murder in the second degree by the absence of the elements purposely and maliciously is incorrect and constitutes prejudicial error, in spite of counsel’s failure to object to the charge.

2. It is prejudicial error for a court, in its charge to the jury as to manslaughter, in a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erwin v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1876
  2. State v. NoltonOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. LoudermillOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. TudorOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Simko v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. State v. MuscatelloOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Andrew Lee Wagster v. Roger T. OverbergCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  4. State v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API