Legal Opinion

Chute v. North River Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 17, 1927No. 26,104PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Appeal from an order sustaining a general demurrer to the complaint in an action to recover on an insurance policy.

The policy covers “jewelry * * * and/or on furs as per schedule attached, against all risks of loss or damage during transportation (including all risks of loss or damage caused by breakage, fire and theft) or otherwise.” Claims for breakage of glass, overwinding, denting and internal damage” to watches and for damage to furs arising “from moth, vermin, wear and tear, or gradual deterioration,” are expressly excluded.

Recovery, is sought for a fire opal valued at $2,000, because,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. Queen Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Marcy v. Sun Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1856
  3. Providence Washington Insurance Co. v. AdlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  4. Gulf Transp. Co. v. Firemans Fund Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Kraemer Bros. v. United States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Sentinel Management Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Essex House v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1975
  5. Standard Structural Steel Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API