Legal Opinion

Campbell v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1971No. 5359PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FICKLING, Associate Judge:

We reverse appellant’s convictions for petit larceny, destruction of property, and attempted burglary II. Since there was no probable cause to arrest, the seizure of a television set during that arrest was illegal and therefore it could not have been properly admitted into evidence.1

About 4 o’clock in the afternoon, while routinely patrolling a neighborhood in an unmarked car, two police officers operating in the “old clothes unit” (without uniforms) observed appellant and a companion walking together. Appellant was openly holding a screwdriver; his companion carried…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. William H. Fuller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. Rhinelda M. Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  3. DuPont v. Crummer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Sammie Jackson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  5. Charles H. Kelley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Stephenson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. United States v. BoswellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Sanders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Arrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API