Berry v. Park
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtNeff, J.
In an automobile collision action for personal injuries the plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment. The defendant appeals.
The first contention is that the trial court erred in refusing to declare a mistrial because of questions asked a certain juror on the voir dire examination. It is contended that the questions informed the jury that the defendant carried liability insurance. When the attorney for the plaintiff was examining the prospective jurors it was discovered that the juror in question was in the insurance business. The attorney asked him if he wrote automobile accident insurance,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Beasley v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Dodson Williams v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Belford v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- McCants v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Jones v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Griffeth v. PoundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Ralston v. TuckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Chew v. FoutsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Odeneal v. HalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Friedman v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.