Legal Opinion
United States v. Danny Baca
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1971No. 410-70, 586-70PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
This is the second time Baca has appealed a conviction for unlawful possession of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174. In the first appeal, United States v. Baca, 417 F.2d 103 (10th Cir. 1969), he argued that the heroin should not have been admitted into evidence because it was the product of an illegal search and seizure. In that case, we held that part of the narcotics were in fact the result of an unconstitutional search and seizure. But it was also explicitly stated that two vials containing heroin and some other narcotics paraphernalia were constitutionally seized…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. Charles P. BourassaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Alan Eugene Reed v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Charles Wallace Nolan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. NoahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Anthony Provenzano, in No. 79-1912, and Thomas Andretta, in No. 79-1913Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Karriem Thorne, Appellee-Petitioner v. Warden, Brooklyn House of Detention for Men, Appellant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Thomas E. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.