Legal Opinion

Hartunian v. Arbella Mutual Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided April 17, 2013Published

1Opinion of the CourtSwan, J.

As an unpaid party, Byron V. Hartunian, M.D., P.C. (“Hartunian”) billed Arbella Mutual Insurance Company (“Arbella”) for personal injury protection (“PIP”) payments pursuant to G.L.c. 90, §34M for services provided to Ronniace Campbell (“Campbell”) arising from an accident involving a vehicle insured by Arbella. Campbell’s claim for PIP benefits had earlier been denied because she had not attended an examination under oath (“EUO”).1 Payment to Hartunian having thus in turn been denied, Hartunian commenced this suit. Raising noncooperation as a defense in its answer, Arbella successfully moved…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Calvi v. Knox CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  2. Lorenzo-Martinez v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  3. Brown v. F.L. Roberts & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. McNamara v. Corte-RealMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
  5. Chiropractic Care Centers, Inc. v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API