Legal Opinion
Burch v. Southern Pac. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada
Decided July 24, 1905No. 813PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Motion to Remand.
1Opinion of the CourtHawley, District Judge
(orally). This action was brought in the state court by the plaintiff, who was and is a resident and citizen of the state of Utah, against the defendant, a corporation, duly organized and existing under the laws of the state of Kentucky, and therefore a resident and citizen of Kentucky, to recover damages for injuries received by plaintiff on account of the alleged negligence of defendant. The defendant, upon filing a petition and bond, secured a removal of the case to this court upon the ground of the diversity of citizenship between the parties.
The motion to remand is based solely upon the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Mexican National Railroad v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Central Trust Co. v. McGeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Kansas City & T. R. v. Interstate Lumber Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1888
- Memphis Sav. Bank v. HouchensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burch v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909
- Cincinnati, Georgetown & Portsmouth Railroad v. Poland, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1910
- Tice v. HurleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1906