Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Georgetown & Portsmouth Railroad v. Poland

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided December 15, 1910Published

1Opinion of the CourtKinkead, J.

The three above named eases were argued and submitted together on demurrers to the petitions.

The plaintiff, the Cincinnati, Georgetown & Porstmouth Railroad Company, claiming to be an interurban railroad company, seeks to enjoin the.state tax commission from certifying to the Auditor of State that it is a “railroad company” and should pay 4 per cent., on its gross earnings, and from taking any action or making report to the Auditor of State whereby it will be charged and required to pay a tax in excess of 1.2 per cent., which is chargeable as against interurban roads.. The state tax…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Malott v. Collinsville C. & E. St. L. Electric R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  2. Burch v. Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API