Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 7, 1951No. 9939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Justice.

Appellee filed this suit'against appellant and alleged that, during the fall of 1948, he and appellant entered into a verbal contract whereby appellee agreed to work for appellant as a farm hand during the year 1949. The terms of the contract as alleged by appellee were that he was to be paid $3 per day for each day he worked as such farm hand; that, in addition thereto, he was to receive the cotton produced on fifty acres of land; that appellant was to furnish him a house to live in, and one cow to milk, with roughness for the cow, but appellee to furnish such other feed as he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Porter & McMillan v. Burkett, Murphy & BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Rogers v. McGuffeyTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Crews v. CortezTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Bost v. McCreaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Phelps v. ConnelleeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dallas County Water Control & Improvement District No. 7 v. IngramCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  2. Professional Services, Inc. v. AmaitisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. City of Temple v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  4. Texas Technological College v. FryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Chris Wilmot v. Harry A. Bouknight, Junior, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API