Legal Opinion

Adamo v. Nextdoor Holdings, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 19, 2025No. 5:24-cv-01213Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 KEITH HOLLINGSWORTH, Case No. 5:24-cv-01213-EJD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS 10 v. 11 NEXTDOOR HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 71, 73 Defendants. 12 13 Lead Plaintiff, Keith Hollingsworth (“Plaintiff”), brings this securities fraud class action 14 under §§ 10(b), 14(a), and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rules 10b-5 and 15 14a-9 promulgated thereunder. First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 65. Before the Court are 16 two motions to dismiss pursuant to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API