Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Doud

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1214Our review of the record confirms that there is substantial evidence supporting the Board’s decision (see Matter of Washington [Kaleida Health — Commissioner of Labor], 51 AD3d 1306, 1307 [2008]; Matter of Hill [Commissioner of Labor], 37 AD3d 931, 932 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 807 [2007]; Matter of Ramirez [Commissioner of Labor], 285 AD2d 925, 926 [2001]). Claimant testified that she refused to ask her physician for the information necessary to support her requested leave of absence because she did not think he would provide it. Claimant also testified, and her letter of resignation stated,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Claim of RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. In re the Claim of WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API