People v. Harris
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ANDERSON, P. J.
Defendant Terry Lee Harris (appellant) stands convicted by jury of first degree murder. On appeal he challenges the admission of postarrest statements made to law enforcement officials after exercising his right to remain silent. We conclude that appellant’s first statement was inadmissible under the factual standard articulated in Michigan v. Mosley (1975) 423 U.S. 96 [46 L.Ed.2d 313, 96 S.Ct. 321], that once a suspect has asserted his Miranda 1 right to remain silent, the interrogating officer must scrupulously honor this request. Accordingly, we reverse. 2
I. Facts
In…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Frederick L. Jackson v. George J. Giurbino, Warden California State Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- People v. Joseph R.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
- Frederick L. Jackson v. George J. Giurbino, Warden California State Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.