Legal Opinion

People v. Aldana

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 2012No. G040320PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

Introduction

Defendants Daniel Aldana and Donna Matney were each charged with two counts of grand theft, and one count each of misappropriation of public funds, knowingly keeping false accounts, and altering public records. A jury acquitted Aldana of all but one count. The jury was unable to reach a verdict as to one count against Matney, and similarly acquitted her of all but one of the remaining counts against her. The jury also found not true all sentencing enhancements alleged against Aldana and Matney.

Aldana and Matney separately appeal their convictions for violating…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. KraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Gonsalves v. HodgsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. AleksanyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. People v. AleksanyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. ShiversAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2015
  5. People v. Wooten CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API