Speer v. Hadduck
Illinois Supreme Court
Weit oe Eeeoe to the Superior Court of Chicago. This was an action of ejectment instituted in the court below, by Hadduck, against Speer, to recover the possession of a part of lot number one, in block number one hundred and forty-one, in the School Section Addition to Chicago, the plaintiff claiming to be the owner in fee simple of the premises, and deriving title from Speer in the following manner : In March, 1856, Speer and his wife executed a mortgage upon the premises…
Read the full summary
Weit oe Eeeoe to the Superior Court of Chicago. This was an action of ejectment instituted in the court below, by Hadduck, against Speer, to recover the possession of a part of lot number one, in block number one hundred and forty-one, in the School Section Addition to Chicago, the plaintiff claiming to be the owner in fee simple of the premises, and deriving title from Speer in the following manner : In March, 1856, Speer and his wife executed a mortgage upon the premises in controversy, to Calvin H. Goodman, to secure the payment of a bond for the sum of $10,000; the mortgage containing a…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice CatoN
Speer and wife executed a mortgage to Goodman, who assigned the same to Terry, who assigned to Wadsworth. The mortgage contained a power of sale as follows: “It shall be lawful for the said party of the second part, his personal representatives or assigns, either in person, or by attorney duly constituted, to enter upon all and singular the premises hereby conveyed, and either in person, or by attorney, to sell the same at public auction, after having first given thirty (30) days’ notice of the time and place of sale, (such sale to be made in the city of Chicago,) by advertisement in any one…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Barrett v. HinckleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Gibbons v. HoagIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Munn v. BurgesIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Mulvey v. GibbonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Moseley v. RamboSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899