Legal Opinion

Tri-State Finance Corp. v. Surry

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 1961No. 9556PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOLIN, Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this action against defendant for the sum of $1,175.40, together with interest and attorney’s fees, allegedly due by defendant to plaintiff on a promissory note, secured by a chattel mortgage on one 1955 Ford pickup truck and one 1955 Chevrolet sedan automobile. Ancillary to the principal demand, plaintiff caused both vehicles to be seized under a writ of sequestration. The defendant resisted the principal demand on a number of grounds, contending, among other things, the plaintiff practiced fraud upon him by inducing him to sign the promissory note in blank…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Combs v. International Harvester CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Brantley v. PruittSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  3. Falk v. Luke Motor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  4. Roby Motors Co. v. HarrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Anderson v. FinleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Snowden v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Talley v. BradleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Smith v. UTILITY & MAINTENANCE CON. OF AMER., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Davis v. Bryan Chevrolet Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. Van BuskirkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API