Tri-State Finance Corp. v. Surry
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BOLIN, Judge.
Plaintiff instituted this action against defendant for the sum of $1,175.40, together with interest and attorney’s fees, allegedly due by defendant to plaintiff on a promissory note, secured by a chattel mortgage on one 1955 Ford pickup truck and one 1955 Chevrolet sedan automobile. Ancillary to the principal demand, plaintiff caused both vehicles to be seized under a writ of sequestration. The defendant resisted the principal demand on a number of grounds, contending, among other things, the plaintiff practiced fraud upon him by inducing him to sign the promissory note in blank…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Combs v. International Harvester CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
- Brantley v. PruittSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Falk v. Luke Motor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- Roby Motors Co. v. HarrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Anderson v. FinleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Snowden v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Talley v. BradleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Smith v. UTILITY & MAINTENANCE CON. OF AMER., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Davis v. Bryan Chevrolet Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. Van BuskirkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965