Legal Opinion
Clemens v. Mount Clemens Cmty. Sch. Dist.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 30, 2018No. Case No. 16–11444PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On December 16, 2015, prior to a Board meeting, a process server in the Wahlstrom Litigation sought to serve a summons and complaint on Defendant Board Members and approached Plaintiff. Plaintiff contacted Defendant Pearson. Defendant Pearson reacted by telling Plaintiff that "the board wasn't going to be happy about this and if the lawsuit went the wrong way, there was no way he could protect me. And if I was stupid, there was no way he could protect me." Id. at 1993. The next day, Defendant Pearson again told her that the Board was not happy. He said he could not protect her if she was…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- David Haddad v. Randall GreggCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Baker v. CarnineDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Carney v. Columbus City Schools Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Dhillon v. SmithersDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023