Legal Opinion

Charles R. Luse v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 15, 1964No. 7444_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICKETT, Circuit Judge.

This is a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to set aside a judgment and sentence on the ground that the plea of guilty entered by the appellant Luse to one count of a 3-count information charging him with the violation of United States statutes relating to bank robbery, was not voluntary. In substance, it is alleged that the Assistant United States Attorney advised Luse’s attorney that if he did not plead guilty to one count of the indictment, he would be tried on all three counts and that the United States Attorney would press for the maximum sentence on each count;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Ralph Bryan Ellison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Elksnis v. GilliganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. John Joseph Putnam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  3. State v. RobbinsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Dennis Maxwell v. John W. Turner, Warden, Utah State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  5. State v. BrinkleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API