Legal Opinion

Blair Milling Co. v. Fruitiger

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 12, 1923No. 24,220PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Atchison district court; William A. Jackson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This action was brought by the Blair Milling Company to recover from A. H. Fruitiger upon two promissory notes, one for $2,000, dated February 13, 1912, and the other for $80.75, dated June 10, 1912. The notes were executed by M. J. Hart, M. L. Hart and the defendant, A. H. Fruitiger. Neither of the Harts could be served with process and the case proceeded against Fruitiger alone. The defendant prevailed and plaintiff appeals.

Fruitiger admitted the execution of the notes, but set up three defenses. First, that the notes were given to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moog v. StrangSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Friend v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  3. Johnston v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  4. Bibb v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1873

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Grand Nat. Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Jones v. PrickettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  5. First National Bank v. StrawnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API