Legal Opinion
A. Sulka & Co. v. City of New Orleans
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided June 5, 1945No. 37566PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAWTHORNE, Justice.
Plaintiff, A. Sulka & Company, instituted this suit attacking the constitutionality of an ordinance of the City of New Orleans and seeking to recover the sum of $250, the amount of a license tax paid thereunder.
Plaintiff, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York, with its domicile and principal place of business in New York City, alleges in its petition that on or about February 11, 1939, its travelling representative, one William S. Ligón, leased a room in a hotel in the City of New Orleans for the purpose of displaying samples and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mouledoux v. MaestriSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- State ex rel. Crow v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- State v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Lisso & Bro. v. Police JurySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Commonwealth v. KennesonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. HattonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Kenneth Wayne Dupuy v. Robert H. Butler, Sr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Comet Industries, Inc. v. LawrenceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Mississippi River Fuel Corporation v. Roland Cocreham, Collector of Revenue of the State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Bazley v. TortorichLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.