Commonwealth v. Kenneson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Complaint on the St. of 1886, e. 818, § 2. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Staples, J., the jury returned a verdict of guilty; and the defendant alleged exceptions, which appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
The offence of selling, or of having in one’s possession with intent to sell, milk “not of good standard quality” was created by the St. of 1886, c. 818, § 2. The quality required by the statute for the months of May and June is different from that for the rest of the year, and this distinction relates to the time when the milk is sold or kept in possession with intent to sell, and not to the time when the milk is obtained from the cow. As this complaint alleges that, on the first day of July, 1886, the defendant had in his possession “ one pint of milk not of good standard quality, that is…
2Cited by20 opinions
- State ex rel. Churchill v. BemisNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Columbia Wire Co. v. BoyceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- Worthington v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1914
- Fletcher v. PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Reynolds v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.