Legal Opinion
Darden v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 30, 1989No. 69-89CPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:
This is a civilian pay case in which Ms. Ute Darden (plaintiff) claimed wrongful and bad faith termination by her former employer, the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES or defendant).1 Plaintiffs complaint, filed on February 8, 1989, asserted jurisdiction in this court under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) (West Supp.1989), and requested relief in the form of reinstatement, back pay, credit for all benefits incident to employment, damages for mental and emotional distress, compensatory damages, attorney fees, and costs. Instead of an answer, on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Adolph Kizas v. William H. Webster, Adolph Kizas v. William H. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Shekoyan v. Sibley International Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Hopkins v. Women's Division, General Board of Global MinistriesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Pitney Bowes Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Cottrell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.