Legal Opinion

Scholtz v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1979No. Appeal, No. 616 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

This is a consolidated appeal from four decisions of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming the referee’s denial of benefits to Pamela Scholtz, Ellen C. Bancroft, Patricia Jean Pickersgill and Janice D. Knnning (claimants) pursuant to Section 401(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law1 (Act).

The claimants, all temporary professional teachers, were hired by the Pittsburgh Board of Public Education in January 1974. It appears from the record that they taught at the Conroy Special Education Center until the summer recess of 1974 and returned to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chickey v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Koba v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Calvano v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Davis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Hyduchak v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goralski v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Milkowski v. Department of LaborAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Ellman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Pac v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Langer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API