Legal Opinion
Pac v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 18, 1979No. Appeals, Nos. 1579, 1580, 1581, 1582, 1597, 1598, 1599, 1600, 1601, 1602, 1603, 1621, 1764, 1765, 1766, 1612, 1635, 1701 and 1848, C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
We have consolidated for argument and disposition the appeals of thirteen substitute teachers, a substitute teacher’s aide1 and a substitute bus driver of Neshaminy School District, three substitute teachers of the Philadelphia School District (two of whom are test claimants for 277 additional Philadelphia substitute teachers) and one substitute teacher of Bristol Township School District from orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denying them unemployment benefits during the school vacation period beginning June 1977. Except the cases of Neshaminy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Calvano v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Ortiz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Sude v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Scholtz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Pleskovic v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sulat v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Alexander v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Board of Education v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Rish v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Grillis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980