Legal Opinion

Carlyle Water, Light & Power Co. v. City of Carlyle

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 14, 1889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clinton County; the Hon. Amos Watts, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, J.

The city of Carlyle, in the latter part of 1886, desiring to provide a system of water-works, entered into a contract with the Water, Light and Power Company of St. Louis, Mo., for the construction of the same, which contract was by ordinance of the city of Carlyle duly enacted, as follows:

Ordinance LTo. 8.

Entitled, an ordinance to provide for a supply of water for , fire protection and for use of the inhabitants of the city of Carlyle, as follows:

Section 1. The Water, Light and Power Company, St. Louis, Mo., a duly incorporated company, its successors and assigns, for and in consideration of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of East St. Louis v. East St. Louis Gas Light & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Decatur Gaslight & Coke Co. v. City of DecaturAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ludington Water-Supply Co. v. City of LudingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Roberts v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Lackey v. Fayetteville Water Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. City of Chicago v. GalpinIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. City of Detroit v. Detroit City Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API