Legal Opinion

Bliss v. Raynor

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Suffolk county court. Action by Ernest F. Bliss, Jr., and Albert E. Bliss against Frank C. Raynor, impleaded with another. From an order requiring the New York Underwriters’ Agency and the Norwich Union Fire Insurance Company to pay to the receiver of the property of defendant Raynor one-half of the amount due on a judgment in favor of one Henry Sayre, and from an order denying the application of said Raynor to vacate and set aside said order, Raynor appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Suffolk county court. Action by Ernest F. Bliss, Jr., and Albert E. Bliss against Frank C. Raynor, impleaded with another. From an order requiring the New York Underwriters’ Agency and the Norwich Union Fire Insurance Company to pay to the receiver of the property of defendant Raynor one-half of the amount due on a judgment in favor of one Henry Sayre, and from an order denying the application of said Raynor to vacate and set aside said order, Raynor appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the county court of Suffolk county requiring two insurance companies to pay to the receiver all the property of the defendant, the amount due from each company being over and above one-half of the amount due upon a judgment in favor of one Henry Sayre, and from an order of the county court denying the application of the appellant to vacate and set aside the first-mentioned order. The sole question involved is whether the sum of $149.90 due the defendant Frank C. Raynor from two insurance companies upon an insurance of exempt property shall be paid to the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bayer v. SackCity of New York Municipal Court · 1910
  2. Van Slyke v. BumgarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API