Legal Opinion

Bayer v. Sack

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 15, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Pbooeedings supplementary .to execution.

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

This is a motion why a third party order heretofore issued on the 28th day of February, 1910, out of this court, staying the officers of the Scottish Union and National Insurance Company of Edinburgh' from paying over money in its possession due to Pineus Sack, one of the judgment debtors herein, should not be vacated and set aside. It appears from the moving affidavits that a judgment of $393.68 was obtained in this court against said Pineus Sack on the 21st day of February, 1908; that on the 23d day of February, 1910, a fire occurred in the apartments occupied by said Pincus Sack, and that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cooney v. CooneyNew York Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Bliss v. RaynorNew York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gaither v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. In re De VriesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1987
  3. In Re DeVriesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API