Legal Opinion

Fisher v. North Hills Passavant Hospital

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 1, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, President Judge.

¶ 1 This is an appeal from the judgment entered following a defense verdict. Finding merit to the claim that Appellants should have been permitted to question a witness to expose her bias, we reverse and award a new trial.

¶2 Appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Fisher, sought damages based upon allegations that Mr. Fisher received inadequate care during his stay at North Hills Passavant Hospital’s (the Hospital’s) emergency room.1

¶3 The trial court recounted certain facts related to the case:

There was no genuine factual issue in his case that the Plaintiff-patient was a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Turney Media Fuel, Inc. v. Toll Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. BirchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Curran v. Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. MullinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boucher v. Pennsylvania HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. Serge, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API